Bridge
BIN 1046900
NY371 over KIRKWOOD CREEK
FairNYSDOT rating 4.65 of 7Inspected Jun 3, 20251 planned project
Planned and programmed work plans as published, not awarded contracts
- A project to replace the bridge that carries NY 371 over Kirkwood Creek (BIN 1046900) in the Town of Cohocton, Steuben County.BRIDGE REHABILITATION OR REPLACEMENT · Contract D265625 · Planned completion Nov 30, 2026
Source: Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), updated Jun 23, 2026; NYSDOT Capital Program projects. Our copy checked Nov 1, 2026.
Inventory facts
Location
- Carries
- NY371
- Crosses
- KIRKWOOD CREEK
- County
- STEUBEN
- NYSDOT region
- (6) Hornell
- Place
- Cohocton (Town)
- Location note
- 2.7 MI NE OF COHOCTON
Ownership
- Owner
- NYSDOT
- Maintained by
- NYSDOT
Design
- Year built
- 1946
- Structure type
- 02 - Stringer/Multi-Beam or Girder
- Material
- 3 - Steel
- Spans
- 1
- Length (ft)
- 42
- Deck area (sq ft)
- 1482
Condition
- NYSDOT condition rating
- 4.651 (poor) to 7 (new)
- FHWA condition
- Fair
- Poor status
- NoBridge Conditions dataset
- NBI superstructure
- 70 to 9
- Last inspection
- 2025-06-03
Load and traffic
- R-posted
- NOPosting flag as recorded
- AADT
- 2388Count year not supplied by this layer
Source: NYSDOT Bridges; Bridge Conditions, NYS Department of Transportation, updated Oct 5, 2026. Our copy checked Nov 1, 2026.
Contracts that name this BIN 3 in the record-plan index
- D265625Awarded Jan 13, 2026BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - NY 371 Over Kirkwood Creek, Town of Cohocton.NY 371 · Cohocton (town) · Steuben · PIN 6035.01 · 82 sheets indexed
- BRIDGE REHAB. ON 5 BRIDGES,;RT. 21, 248, 371;NY 21, NY 248, NY 371 · Wayland (village), Cohocton (town), West Union (town), Greenwood (town), Canisteo (town) · Allegany and others · PIN 6084.27 · 84 sheets indexed
- RC 45-033Awarded Oct 10, 1945R.C.C.P. RECON. & BRIDGE;NY 15, NY 21, NY 371, NY 63 · Wayland (town), Cohocton (town) · Steuben · 27 sheets indexed
Source: NYSDOT Highway Record Plans, updated Jun 26, 2026. Our copy checked Nov 1, 2026. A BIN named in a contract's index row does not prove every drawing applies to this structure.